Artykuły
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-6519
In this article, the Author undertook the task of compiling a biography of Guillelmus Durantis, a bishop and legal scholar, and the characteristics of his work. The study reveals the author of Speculum iudiciale as a seasoned church official and a scholar in Roman and canon law. Because of his administrative and mediatorial talents, Durantis was often employed on matters requiring the Pope’s ongoing interventions. He organized and clarified the liturgy and presented the entire process now known as Roman-canonical process in a single work. Durantis’ findings closed many scientific and practical debates about the process for several centuries.
The special significance of Durantis ‚ Speculum Iudiciale, presented in this article, can be explained both by the excellence of the work and by the nature of the procedural law norms themselves. While substantive law deals with the most diverse aspects of life, often independent from the man, procedural law is an exclusive product of the man, entirely dependent on his actions, and therefore can and should be written precisely. Of course, difficult cases can arise even here, but its formation can be far more precise than the substantive law regulating an infinite variety of situations. For the purposes of the Roman-canonical process, such shaping has succeeded, as evidenced by the centuries-old authority of the Speculum Judiciale.
Andrieu M. (red.), Le Pontifi cal romain au moyen âge, t. 2. Le Pontifi cal de la curie romaine au XIIIe siècles, Città del Vaticano 1940.
Andrieu M. (red.), Le Pontifi cal romain au moyen âge, t. 3. Le Pontifi cal de Guillaume Durand, Città del Vaticano 1940.
Barbero A.G., Enrico da Susa. Vita di un celebre giurista nell’Europa del XIII secolo, Durham (USA) 2023.
Bergmann F.C. (red.), Pillius, Tancredus, Gratia, Libri de iudiciorum ordine, Göttingen 1842.
Berthelé J., Valmery M. (red.), Les Instructiones et constitutiones de Guillaume Durand le Spéculateur d’après le ms. de Cessenon, Montpellier 1905.
Boni W., Fiorini Galassi M.G., Ribezzi E., Guido da Suzzara Giureconsulto, Suzzara 1987.
Boyle L.E., The date of the Commentary of William Durant on the Constitutions of the Second Council of Lyon, „Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law” 4, 1974.
Bradley R., Backgrounds of the Title Speculum in Mediaeval Literature, „Speculum” 29, January 1954, nr 1.
Condorelli O., Guillaume Durand (c. 1230–1296), [w:] Great Christian Jurists in French History, red. O. Descamps, R. Domingo, Cambridge 2019.
Colli V., Lo „Speculum iudiciale” di Guillaume Durand: codice d’autore ed edizione universitaria, [w:] Juristische Buchproduktion im Mittelalter, red. V. Colli, Frankfurt am Main 2002.
Duranti G., Rationale divinorum offi ciorum, red. A. Davril, T.M. Thibodeau, t. 1–4, Turnhout 1995.
Durantis G., In sacrosanctum Lugdunense concilio sub Gregorio X Guglielmi Duranti cognomento Speculatoris commentarius, Fano 1569.
Durantis G., Speculum Iudiciale, Basileae 1563.
Durantis G., Speculum Iudiciale. Illustratum et repurgatum a Giovanni Andrea et Baldo degli Ubaldi, Aalen 1975 (reprint wydania Basileae 1574).
Fowler-Magerl L., Ordo iudiciorum vel ordo iudiciarius. Begriff und Literaturgattung, Frankfurt am Main 1984.
Gaudemet J., Durand. Guillaume, detto lo Speculatore, [w:] Dizionario Biografi co degli Italiani, t. 42, red. A.M. Ghisalberti, Rome 1993, https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/durand-guillaumedetto-lo-speculatore_(Dizionario-Biografico)/.
Hendrix S., How Albert the Great’s „Speculum Astronomiae” was Interpreted and Used by Four Centuries of Readers: A Study in Late Medieval Medicine, Astronomy, and Astrology, Lewiston 2010.
Il „Pontificalis liber ” di Agostino Patrizi Piccolomini e Giovanni Burcardo (1485) (wyd. anastatyczne), red. i wprow. M. Sodi, Città del Vaticano 2006.
Lange H., Römisches Recht im Mittelalter, t. 1. Die Glossatoren, München 1997.
Lange H., Kriechbaum M., Römisches Recht im Mittelalter, t. 2. Die Kommentatoren, München 2007.
Litewski W., Der römisch-kanonische Zivilprozeß nach den älteren ordines iudiciarii, t. 1, Kraków 1999.
Nörr K., „Ordo iudiciorum” und „Ordo iudiciarius”, „Studia Gratiana” 11, 1967.
Obertyński Z., Pontyfikaty krakowskie XV wieku, „Prawo Kanoniczne. Kwartalnik prawno-historyczny” 4, 1961, nr 1–4.
Sarti M., Fattorini M., De claris Archigymnasii bononiensis professoribus a saeculo XI usque ad saeculum XIV, t. 1, Bononiae 1769.
Savigny F.C. von, Geschichte des römischen Rechts im Mittelalter, t. 5, Heidelberg 1850.
Schulte J.F. von, Die Geschichte der Quellen und Literatur des canonischen Rechts von Gratian bis auf die Gegenwart, t. 2. Von Papst Gregor IX. bis zum Concil von Trient, Stuttgart 1877.
Schwenzer D., Ricardus Anglicus (de Mores, de Morins), [w:] Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon, t. 18, Herzberg 2001.
Soetermeer F., Wilhelm Durand, [w:] Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon, t. 22, Nordhausen 2003, https://www.academia.edu/15622451/Gulielmus_Duranti_Guillaume_Durand.
Stickler A.M., Ordines iudiciarii, [w:] Dictionaire de Droit Canonique, t. 6, Paris 1967.
Szymańska A., Odofredus, „Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Prawo” 313, 2011.
Szymańska A., O znaczeniu Accursiusa i jego „Glossa magna”, „Rocznik Stowarzyszenia Naukowców Polaków Litwy” 19, 2019.
Szymoszek E., „Iudex” w literaturze procesowej XII–XIII wieku, Wrocław 1976.
Vasina A., I Romagnoli fra autonomia cittadina e accentramento papale nell’età di Dante, Firenze 1965.
English
Język Polski
https://doi.org/10.19195/0524-4544.338.9
