Peer review

1. All submissions undergo preliminary formal and substantive assessment by the Editorial Team. If an article is in line with the profile of the Studia Linguistica journal and fulfils the requirements listed in the “Information for Authors”, it passes to the next stage of the procedure.

2. The editorial assistant sends the submissions to two reviewers for assessment.

3. The Editorial Team selects the reviewers from among specialists in a given field, taking into account the subject editor’s suggestion. A reviewer may come from the journal’s list of regular reviewers or from outside the list. The selected reviewers must guarantee independence as well as a lack of conflict of interests with the authors (no direct personal relationship, professional subordination and direct scholarly collaboration over the last two years preceding the writing of the review).

4. In the case of foreign-language submissions, one of the reviewers is, if possible, a person affiliated to an institution in a country other than the country in which the author of the submission lives or works.

5. The reviews are doubly anonymous: the reviewers and the authors do not know their identities (double-blind review procedure). Information about the reviewer can be declassified only in the case of a negative review or an article containing controversial elements, following the author’s request, if the reviewer in question agrees to reveal this information.

6. The reviewers should take into account the substantive value of the articles under review, in particular their originality and scholarly value as well as whether they tackle new research problems. What is also evaluated is the formal side of each submission.

7. Reviews are made in written form. Each review should contain an unequivocal conclusion as to whether the article in question should or should not be accepted for publication. The review may contain a conclusion whereby the article may be accepted for publication after the author has fulfilled specific conditions (after introducing corrections or additions). The author responds to the review in writing.

8. A submission is accepted for publication after both reviewers have testified to its high substantive quality, in particular, its originality.

9. If the conclusions of the two reviews diverge, the Editorial Team decides whether the article should be accepted for publication. In such a case the opinion of a super-reviewer may also be referred to.

10. The Editorial Team reserves the right to propose, on the basis of its own or the reviewers’ opinions, corrections to be introduced by the author on which will depend the final decision concerning publication.

11. A list of regular reviewers is published by the Editorial Team once a year in Studia Linguistica and online. The list is published in alphabetical order.

12. The article review procedure complies with the guidelines of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education published in the document “Good Practices in Review Procedures in Science”, Warsaw 2011.

Reviewers

Below is a list of reviewers collaborating with the journal Studia Linguistica since 2002. Furthermore, the names of the reviewers collaborating on a given issue are published in each journal issue.

prof. Joachim Ballweg (Heppenheim/IDS Mannheim, Germany)

† prof. dr hab. Iwona Bartoszewicz (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland) 

prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Biardzka (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr hab. Monika Bielińska, prof. UŚ (Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach, Poland)

prof. dr hab. Zofia Bilut-Homplewicz (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Poland)

dr hab. Marek Biszczanik, prof. UZ (Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland)

† prof. dr hab. Joanna Błaszczak (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr Jarosław Bogacki (Uniwersytet Opolski, Poland)

dr Zuzanna Bułat Silva (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland) 

prof. dr hab. Anna Dąbrowska (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr hab. Jarochna Dąbrowska-Burkhardt, prof. UZ (Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland)

prof. dr hab. Adam Fałowski (Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, Poland)

dr hab. Michał Garcarz, prof. UWr (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr hab. Ireneusz Gaworski (Uniwersytet Warszawski, Poland) 

dr hab. Jacek Grębowiec (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland) 

dr hab. Anna Jaroszewska, prof. UW (Uniwersytet Warszawski, Poland)

dr hab. Iwona Kokorniak, prof. UAM (Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poland)

prof. dr hab. Michał Kotin (Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland) 

dr hab. Maria Katarzyna Lasatowicz, prof. UO (Uniwersytet Opolski, Poland)

prof. dr hab. Anna Michońska-Stadnik (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr hab. Michał Nkollo, prof. UAM (Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poland) 

prof. dr hab. Ulrike Notarp (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic)

prof. dr hab. Karin Pittner (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany)

dr hab. Barbara Rodziewicz, prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Poland)

prof. dr hab. Roman Sadziński (Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland) 

dr hab. Czesława Schatte, prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adam Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poland)

dr hab. Petra Szatmári (Károli Gáspár University / Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Hungary)

dr hab. Janusz Taborek, prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adam Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poland)

prof. dr hab. Hélène Vinckel-Roisin (Université de Lorraine, France) 

dr hab. Witold Ucherek (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr Justyna Wesoła (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr hab. Włodzimierz Wysoczański, prof. UWr (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

dr hab. Monika Zaśko-Zielińska, prof. UWr (Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland)

Publisher
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wydawnictwo „Szermierz”
ISSN: 0137-1169
e-ISSN: 2957-2320
10.19195/0137-1169
Licence

Contact

Instytut Filologii Germańskiej
Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
pl. Biskupa Nankiera 15 b
50-140 Wrocław

wroc.linguistica@gmail.com

Indexation

  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • Erih Plus
  • Index Copernicus
  • Cambridge Scientific Abstracts (CSA, ProQuest)
  • The Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (CEJSH)