Law and (In)Justice — a Few Reflections on the Covid Act

Abstract

The provisions of the Covid Act cannot be applauded for their systemic nature and the comprehensibility of the legal language. In the paper, three examples are discussed: first, the accessibility of the aid guaranteed by the so-called anti-crisis shields to foreign entrepreneurs; second, the justifiability of nuancing the premises of granting state protective benefits during the Covid epidemic (especially in the context of the usage of the expressions “identical” and “the same”); third, an example related to the identification of the forms of the activities of public administration, in the context of the recourse to the law as a means of protecting the rights of an entrepreneur. These examples serve to show the problems caused by faulty legislation.