Artykuły

Tom 45 Nr 2 (2023)

Using the free market against itself? The strategy of promoting national champions by authoritarian regimes — motivations and limitations

Strony: 37-56

PDF (English)

Abstrakt

After the end of the Cold War it seemed that authoritarian regimes are bound to suffer economic marginalization because command economies proved to be unable to compete with free and open markets. Currently, however, we witness a number of non-democratic, authoritarian States capable of abusing market rules to create an unfair advantage to their undertakings — “National Champions” — competing with other enterprises, which are bound into a tight corset of anti-subsidy regulations, so ultimately to achieve regimes’ political goals. In this context, the paper — based primarily on analysis and review of literature and secondarily on dogmatic analysis — by presenting a set of interlinked political and economic motivations seeks to argue that, on the one hand, strategic rejection of free market doctrine is an inherent feature of authoritarian regimes, and on the other, that inefficiencies endemic in non-democratic forms of governments reduce the likelihood of successful implementation of the eponymous strategy. On this basis, the secondary aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual basis for answering the following question: Considering the need to adapt to long-term effects of the current economic uncertainty, are the strategies of creating undue competitive advantages for national champions pursued by many authoritarian regimes serious enough threat to free markets to warrant a response from the international community.

Bibliografia

Bagwell K., Remedies in the WTO: An Economic Perspective, Discussion Paper No. 0607-09, New york 2007, https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8JT02J8/download.

Beck A.T., Prisoners of Hate: The Cognitive Basis of Anger, Hostility and Violence, New york 1999.

Behboodi R., Industrial Subsidies and Friction in World Trade Trade Policies or Trade Politics?, Abingdon 1994.

Bjørnskov C., “Economic freedom and economic crises,” European Journal of Political Economy 45, 2016, supplement: On Institutions and Well-Being, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpole-co.2016.08.003.

Blockx J., “The proposal for an EU regulation on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market: How will it impact corporate mergers and acquisitions?,” SRRN, 5.10.2021, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3936624.

Brabazon H., Neoliberal Legality: Understanding the Role of Law in the Neoliberal Project, Abingdon 2017.

Brander J.A., Spencer B.J., “Export subsidies and international market share rivalry,” Journal of International Economics 18, 1985, nos. 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(85)90006-6.

Braw E., “Cutting-edge tech takeovers are a strategic threat to the West,” Financial Times, 7.10.2019, https://www.ft.com/content/763cae4e-e5ed-11e9-b8e0-026e07cbe5b4.

Bremmer I., “State capitalism comes of age: The end of the free market?,” Foreign Affairs 88, 2009, no. 3, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20699562.

Choi C., Hoon Jee S., “Differential effects of information and communication technology on (de-)democratization of authoritarian regimes,” International Studies Quarterly 65, 2021, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab053.

Cohen E., Le Colbertisme «high tech»: Économie des Télécom et du Grand Projet, Paris 1992.

Demsetz H., “Information and efficiency: Another viewpoint,” The Journal of Law & Economics 12, 1969, no. 1, https://www.jstor.org/stable/i229057.

Diamond L., “Elections without democracy: Thinking about hybrid regimes,” Journal of Democracy 13, 2002, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0025.

Duvall R.D., Freeman J.R., “The state and dependent capitalism,” International Studies Quarterly 25, 1981, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/2600212.

European State Aid Law: A Commentary, eds. F.-J. Säcker, F. Montag, Munich 2016.

Evans P., Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil, Princeton 1979.

Falck O., Gollier C., Woessmann L., “Arguments for and against policies to promote national champions,” [in:] Industrial Policy for National Champions, eds. O. Falck, C. Gollier, L. Woessmann, Cambridge 2011.

Feher F., Heller A., Markus G., Dictatorship over Needs: An Analysis of Soviet Societies, Oxford 1983.

Finger J.M., Hall H.K., Nelson D.R., “The political economy of administered protection,” The American Economic Review 72, 1982, no. 3, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1831544.

Fran C.S., Lin C., Treisman D., “Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world,” Journal of Public Economics 93, 2009, nos. 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpube-co.2008.09.001.

Green A., Trebilcock M., “Enforcing WTO obligations: What can we learn from export subsidies?,” Journal of International Economic Law 10, 2007, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgm023.

Gunaratne S.A., “Thank you Newton, welcome Prigogine: ‘Unthinking’ old paradigms and embracing new directions, part 1: Theoretical distinctions,” Communications 28, 2003, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2003.028.

Guriev S., Triesman D., “Informational autocrats,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33, 2019, no. 4, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796838.

Haley U., Haley G., Subsidies to Chinese Industry: State Capitalism, Business Strategy and Trade Policy, Oxford 2013.

Hayward J., “Europe’s endangered industrial champions,” [in:] Industrial Enterprise and European Integration: From National to International Champions in Western Europe, ed. J. Hayward, Oxford 1995.

Hellman J., Kaufmann D., “Confronting the challenge of state capture in transition economies,” Finance and Development 38, 2001, no. 3.

Hemphill T.A., White III G., “China’s national champions: The evolution of a national industrial policy — or a new era of economic protectionism?,” Thunderbird International Business Review 55, 2013, no. 2, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/96704/21535_ftp.pdf?sequence=1.

Holmes L., The End of Communist Power: Anti-Corruption Campaigns and Legitimation Crisis, Oxford 1993.

Huntington S., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman 1991.

Inglehart R., Welzel C., Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge 2005.

International Business Diplomacy: How Can Multinational Corporations Deal with Global Challenges, ed. H. Ruël, Den Haag 2018.

Jensen N.M., Johnston N.P., “Political risk, reputation, and the resource curse,” Comparative Political Studies 44, 2011, no. 6, https://doi.org/10.1177/001041401140120.

Johns L., Wellhausen R.L., “Under one roof: Supply chains and the protection of foreign investment,” American Political Science Review 110, 2016, no. 1.

Katz L.F., Summers L.H., “Can inter-industry wage differentials justify strategic trade policy?,” [in:] Trade Policies for International Competitiveness, ed. R. Feenstra, Chicago 1989.

Kociubiński J., “The proposed regulation on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market: The way forward or dead end?,” European Competition and Regulatory Law Review 6, 2022, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2022/1/8.

Kociubiński J., “Racjonalne przedsiębiorstwo jako racjonalne założenie prawodawcy w obszarze prawa konkurencji: zarys problemu,” Przegląd Prawa i Administracji 120, 2020, part 2, https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.120.78.

Kokkoris I., Shelanski H., EU Merger Control: An Economic and Legal Analysis, Oxford 2014.

Krueger A.O., “Why crony capitalism is bad for economic growth,” [in:] Crony Capitalism and Economic Growth in Latin America, ed. S. Haber, Stanford 2002.

Krugman P., Obstfeld M., International Economics: Theory and Policy, Boston 2005.

Leightner J., Ethics, Efficiency and Macroeconomics in China: From Mao to Xi, Abingdon 2017.

Li W., Roland G., Xie y., “Crony capitalism, the party-state, and the political boundaries of corruption,” Journal of Comparative Economics 50, 2019, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2022.02.002.

Linz J., An Authoritarian Regime: Spain, New york 1970.

Lorenz E., “Deterministic nonperiodic flow,” Journal of Atmospheric Science 20, 1963, no. 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.

Lorenz E., “The butterfly effect,” [in:] The Chaos Avant-Garde: Memories of the Early Days of Chaos Theory, eds. R. Abraham, y. Ueda, Singapore 2000.

Marx K., A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, transl. S. W. Ryazanskaya, ed. M. Dobb, London 1971.

Maude B., International Business Negotiation: Principles and Practice, London 2020.

Mestelman S., “General equilibrium modelling of industries with production externalities,” The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique 19, 1986, no. 3, https://www.jstor.org/stable/i300989.

Mietzner M., “Dysfunction by design: Political finance and corruption in Indonesia,” Critical Asian Studies 47, 2015, no. 4.

Morawski L., Główne problemy współczesnej filozofii prawa. Prawo w toku przemian, Warszawa 1999.

Morton H.W., “Who gets what, when and how? Housing in the Soviet Union,” Soviet Studies 32, 1980, no. 2, https://www.jstor.org/stable/151234.

Musacchio A., Lazzarini S.G., Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond, Harvard 2014.

Pauly M., “The economics of moral hazard: Comment,” The American Economic Review 58, 1968, no. 3.

Popper K., Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford 1973.

Poretti P., The Regulation of Subsidies within the General Agreement on Trade in Services of the WTO: Problems and Prospects, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009.

Porter M., “The competitive advantage of nations,” Harvard Business Review 1990, nos. 3–4, https://hbr.org/1990/03/the-competitive-advantage-of-nations.

Research Handbook on Economic Diplomacy: Bilateral Relations in a Context of Geopolitical Change, eds. P.A.G. van Bergeijk, S.J.V Moons, Cheltenham 2018.

Skocpol T., States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China, Cambridge 1979.

Som L., State Capitalism: Why SOEs Matter and the Challenges They Face, Oxford 2022.

Sørgard L., “The economics of national champions,” European Competition Journal 3, 2017, no. 1, https://10.5234/ecj.v3n1.48.

Spencer B.J., “Countervailing duty laws and subsidies to imperfectly competitive industries,” [in:] Issues in US–EC Trade Relations, eds. R.E. Baldwin, C.B. Hamilton, A. Sapir, Chicago 1988.

Suleiman E., Les élites en France. Grands corps et grandes écoles, Paris 1979.

Svolik M., The Politics of Authoritarian Rule, Cambridge 2012.

Sykes A.O., The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 186, Chicago 2003.

Tan X., Managing International Business in China, Cambridge 2016.

Tihanyi L., Aguilera R., Heugens P., van Essen M., Sauerwald S., Duran P., Turturea R., “State ownership and political connections,” Journal of Management 45, 2019, no. 6, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318822113.

Trebilcock M.J., Hartle D.G., “The choice of governing instrument,” International Review of Law and Economics 2, 1982, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(82)90012-6.

Viallet-Thévenin S., “From national champion to international champion: Resistance and transformations to a model of competition in the energy sector during the period 1990–2010,” Revue française de science politique 65, 2015, nos. 5–6, https://www.jstor.org/stable/revfranscipoleng.65.issue-5-6.

Case C-278/00 Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities, ECLI:EU- :C:2004:239.

Case T-136/05 EARL Salvat père & fils, Comité interprofessionnel des vins doux naturels et vins de liqueur à appellations contrôlées (CIVDN) and Comité national des interprofessions des vins à appellation d’origine (CNIV) v Commission of the European Communities, EU:T:2007:295.

Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings [2004] OJ L 24/1.

European Commission, White Paper on Levelling the Playing Field as Regards Foreign Subsidies COM(2020) 253 final.

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.