Artykuły
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-6751
The landscape has been of particular interest since the 1970s, and this is largely due to the threats to nature resulting from the climate crisis. The axis of the argument is the assumption of a significant relationship between the concept of landscape and the nature-culture relationship in the modern era and today. The text reflects on the meaning of the concept of landscape in aesthetic and cultural terms and within the framework of contemporary environmental aesthetics and the philosophy of natural heritage. Landscape as an aesthetic idea emerged in the modern era with the development of landscape painting. In J. Ritter’s approach, the concept of landscape focuses, as in a lens, on the modern-era attitude of man to nature. Landscape as a medium is not only a genre of art but also becomes a carrier of ideas, social needs and political aspirations. The content of the article refers to the concept of W.J.T. Mitchell and S. Pietraszko. Landscape as an environment and natural heritage will be discussed in the example of A. Carlson’s concept and approach to nature and landscape which is reflected in UNESCO conventions.
Berleant A. (2007), Prze-myśleć estetykę. Niepokorne eseje o estetyce i sztuce, transl. M. Korusiewicz, T. Markiewka, K. Wilkoszewska (ed.), Universitas.
Burckhardt J. (1937), The Civilization of the Renaissance, transl. S.G.C. Middlemore, The Phaidon, https://download.tuxfamily.org/openmathdep/history/Renaissance_in_Italy-Burckhardt.pdf.
Carlson A. (2000), Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art and Architecture, Routledge.
Carlson A. (1979), “Appreciation and the Natural Environment”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37, 267–276.
Cassirer E. (1998), Esej o człowieku. Wstęp do filozofii kultury, transl. A. Staniewska, Czytelnik.
Mitchell W.J.T. (2002), “Imperial Landscape”, [in:] Landscape and Power, W.J.T. Mitchell (Ed.), The University of Chicago Press.
Piepmeier R. (1980), “Das Ende der ästhetischen Kategorie ‚Landschaft’. Zu einem Aspekt neuzeitlichen Naturverhältnisses”, Westfälische Forschungen, 30, 8–46.
Pietraszko S. (2014), „Krajobraz i kultura”, [in:] Krajobrazy. Antologia, B. Frydryczak, D. Angutek (Eds.), Wydawnictwo PTPN.
Ritter J. (1963), Landschaft. Zur Funktion des Ästhetischen in der modernen Gesellschaft, (Schriften der Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster, H. 54).
Saito Y. (1985), “The Japanese Appreciation of Nature”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 25, 239–251.
Saito Y. (1998), “Appreciating Nature on its Own Terms”, Environmental Ethics, 20, 135–149.
Salwa M. (2020), Krajobraz. Fenomen estetyczny, Wydawnictwo Oficyna.
Salwa M. (2021), “Wstęp do filozofii dziedzictwa innego-niż-ludzkie”, Kultura Współczesna. Teoria. Interpretacje. Praktyka, (113) 1, 158–171. DOI 10.26112/kw.2021.113.12.
Sauerland K. (1996), “Kontrowersja wokół wspinaczki Petrarki”, [in:] Studia z filozofii niemieckiej, t. 2. Szkoła Rittera, S. Czerniak, J. Rolewski (Eds.), Wydawnictwo UMK.
Simmel G. (1957), Philosophie der Landschaft (1913), [in:] G. Simmel, Brüke und Tür. Essays des Philosphen zur Geschchte, Religion, Kunst und Gesellschaft, M. Sustnan, M. Landmann (Eds.), Köhler, p. 141–152.
Taylor Ch. (2001), “Descartes Disengaged Reason”, [in:] Ch. Taylor, Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity, Harvard University Press, p. 143–159.
English
Język Polski
https://doi.org/10.19195/1895-8001.19.2.5
