Artykuły
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3285-0515
The paper is a contribution to discussions about prospects of reaffirmation of the ontological-political interpretation of Hobbes’s thought advised in the mid-twentieth century by Leo Strauss and C.B. Macpherson. The paper begins with an outline of the main avenues and lines of contention and division within contemporary Hobbes studies, constituted as examples of the “definitive rejection” of Strauss’s and Macpherson’s interpretations. In the second part, there are discussed some issues in detail that help us to define the meaning of the political ontology in Hobbes’s thought as determined by the pair of oppositions “juridical (negative) power” — “ontological-generative (positive) power”. In the third and fourth parts there are considered two main aspects and implications of the Hobbesian theory of sovereignty, as well as the current debates around it (launched mainly as a result of inspiration by Carl Schmitt’s reading of the theory): firstly, the doctrine of an exception/state of emergency in relation to the idea of citizenship and human rights, and, secondly, metaphysical-political and theological-political, justifications of the “monistic” authority of the absolute power juxtaposed against a pluralist and democratic (republican), and at the same time a-secular and cross-religious-comparative considerations of sovereignty of the “people” (as a “multitude”). As a result of the proposed analyzes and reflections, the religious and theological foundations (considered through comparative studies on the doctrines and traditions of three monotheistic religions) are highlighted for questioning the “essentialist” approach to the “fetishism” of sovereignty in the most influential doctrines from Schmitt to Morgenthau and Hinsley.
Ademi C., The Relationship between Maqasid al-Shari’ah and Usul al-Fiqh, [w:] The Objectives of Islamic Law: The Promises and Challenges of the Maqaṣid al-Shari’a, I. Nassery, R. Ahmed, M. Tatari (eds.), Lanham 2018, s. 213–238.
Andrew E., The Absence of Macpherson and Strauss in Pocock’s Machiavellian Moment, „History of European Ideas” 43 (2017), s. 147–155.
Arendt H., Korzenie totalitaryzmu, tłum. D. Grinberg, M. Szawiel, Warszawa 2008.
al-Attar M., The Ethics and Metaphysics of Divine Command Theory, [w:] The Routledge Companion to Islamic Philosophy, R.C. Taylor, L.X. López-Farjeat (eds.), London-New York 2015.
Auda J., Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach, London-Washington 2007.
Bartelson J., A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge 1995.
Bartelson J., Sovereignty as Symbolic Form, London-New York 2014.
Behrent M. C., Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free-Market Creed, 1976–1979, „Modern Intellectual History” 6 (2009), s. 539–568.
Bendersky J., Carl Schmitt: Theorist for the Reich, Princeton 1983.
Benhabib S., Prawa innych. Przybysze, rezydenci i obywatele, tłum. M. Filipczuk, Warszawa 2015.
Berlin I., Hobbes, Locke and Professor Macpherson, „Political Quarterly” 35 (1964), s. 444–468.
Blau A., Methodologies of Interpreting Hobbes: Historical and Philosophical, [w:] Interpreting Hobbesʼs Political Philosophy, S.A. Lloyd (ed.), Cambridge 2019.
Bonefeld W., Authoritarian Liberalism: From Schmitt via Ordoliberalism to the Euro, „Critical Sociology” 43 (2017), s. 747–761.
Bonefeld W., Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism, „New Political Economy” 17 (2012), s. 633–656.
Bourdieu P., The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger, Stanford 1991.
Boucher D., Appropriating Hobbes: Legacies in Political, Legal, and International Thought, Oxford 2018.
Bray M., Macpherson Restored? Hobbes and the Question of Social Origin, „History of Political Thought” 28 (2007), s. 56–90.
Breakey H., C. B. Macpherson, “The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke”, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory, J.T. Levy (ed.), Oxford 2015 (online edn, Oxford Academic).
Bull M., Anti-Nietzsche, London 2011.
Connolly W., Climate Machines, Fascist Drives, and Truth, Durham-London 2019.
Connolly W., Pluralism and Faith, [w:] Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, H. de Vries, L.E. Sullivan, New York 2006.
Curran E., The Strength and Significance of Subjects’ Rights in Leviathan, [w:] A Companion to Hobbes, M.P. Adams (ed.), Hoboken 2021, s. 221–235.
Dews P., Nietzsche for Losers?, „New Left Review” 86 (2014), s. 209–230.
Di Cesare D., Heidegger and the Jews: The Black Notebooks, Cambridge 2018.
Douglass R., Thomas Hobbes’s Changing Accounts of Liberty and Challenge to Republicanism, „History of Political Thought” 36 (2015), s. 281–309.
Femia J.V., An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for Studying the History of Ideas, [w:] Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics, J. Tully (ed.), Princeton 1988.
Flew T., Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and Contemporary Neo-Liberalism Debates, „Thesis Eleven” 108 (2012), s. 44–65.
Foucault M., Historia seksualności, tłum. B. Banasiak, T. Komendant, K. Matuszewski, Warszawa 1995.
Foucault M., Trzeba bronić społeczeństwa. Wykłady w Collège de France, 1975–1976, tłum. M. Kowalska, Warszawa 1998.
Goodhart M., Theory in Practice: Quentin Skinner’s Hobbes, Reconsidered, „The Review of Politics” 62 (2000), s. 531–561.
Günsoy F., Mutlak başlangıç, olay ve egemenlik, [w:] Uluslararasi Istanbul Felsefe Kongresi bildiri kitabi, cilt 4, Çağdaş etik ve politik felsefe / Istanbul International Congress on Philosophy Proceedings Book, vol. 4, Contemporary Ethics and Political Philosophy, M.E. Kardeş, N. Yıldız (eds.), Istanbul 2018, s. 105–116.
Hamilton J.J., The Social Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought, „Modern Intellectual History” 11 (2014), s. 1–29.
Harvey R., The Qur’an and the Just Society, Edinburgh 2018.
Harvey R., Transcendent God, Rational World: A Maturidi Theology, Edinburgh 2021.
Harvey R., Whose Justice? When Maturidi Meets MacIntyre, [w:] Justice in Islam: New Ethical Perspectives, R. Harvey, D. Tutt (eds.), Herndon 2023, s. 50–76.
Harvey R., Tutt D., Mapping Justice in Islamic Thought: From the Premodern to the Postmodern, [w:] Justice in Islam: New Ethical Perspectives, R. Harvey, D. Tutt (eds.), Herndon 2023, s. 1–25.
Heidegger M., Heidegger and Schmitt: The Bottom Line (Letter to Carl Schmitt, Freiburg i. Br., August 22, 1933), „Telos” 72 (1987 [1933]), s. 132.
Helmisaari V., Thomas Hobbes and Contemporary Italian Thinkers: Permanent War in Giorgio Agamben, Roberto Esposito and Antonio Negri, Helsinki 2020.
Hillani A.M., Hobbes Among the Savages: Politics, War, and Enmity in the So-called State of Nature, „Hobbes Studies” 30 (2023), s. 97–121.
Hillyer R., Keith Thomas’ ‘Definitive Refutation’ of C. B. Macpherson: Revisiting ‘The Social Origins of Hobbes’ Political Thought’, „Hobbes Studies” 15 (2002), s. 32–44.
Hiruta K., Hannah Arendt, Liberalism, and Freedom from Politics, [w:] Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution, K. Hiruta (ed.), Cham 2019, s. 17–45.
Honig B., Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy, Princeton-Oxford 2009.
Isin E.F., Citizenship After Orientalism: An Unfinished Project, „Citizenship Studies” 16 (2012), s. 563–572.
Isin E.F., Turner B.S., Investigating Citizenship: An Agenda for Citizenship Studies, „Citizenship Studies” 11 (2007), s. 5–17.
Kapust D.J., Turner B.P., Democratical Gentlemen and the Lust for Mastery: Status, Ambition, and the Language of Liberty in Hobbes’s Political Thought, „Political Theory” 41 (2013), s. 648–675.
Koikkalainen P., Contextualist Dilemmas: Methodology of the History of Political Theory in Two Stages, „History of European Ideas” 37 (2011), s. 315–324.
Kramer M.H., Freedom, Unfreedom and Skinner’s Hobbes, „Journal of Political Philosophy” 9 (2001), s. 204–216.
Lamb R., Quentin Skinner’s Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique, „History of the Human Sciences” 22 (2009), s. 51–73.
Loxley J., ’Not Sure of Safety’: Hobbes and Exile, [w:] Literatures of Exile in the English Revolution and its Aftermath, 1640–1690, Ph. Major (ed.), Farnham 2010, s. 133–152.
Major R., The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American Political Science, „Political Research Quarterly” 58 (2005), s. 477–485.
Marchart O., Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau, Edinburgh 2007.
Marder M., Groundless Existence: The Political Ontology of Carl Schmitt, New York 2010.
Martinich A.P., Tomas Hobbes, New York 1997.
Mastnak T., Making History: The Politics of Hobbes’s, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, A.P. Martinich, K. Hoekstra (eds.), Oxford 2016, s. 575–602.
Meguid A.A., Reversing Schmitt: The sovereign as a guardian of rational pluralism and the peculiarity of the Islamic state of exception in al-Juwayni’s dialectical theology, „European Journal of Political Theory” 19 (2020), s. 489–511.
Miller T.H., Mortal Gods: Science, Politics, and the Humanist Ambitions of Thomas Hobbes, University Park 2011.
Mills C., Biopolitics, Abingdon 2017.
Modood T., Majoritarian Interculturalism and Multicultural Nationalism, [w:] Citizenship and Multiculturalism in Western Liberal Democracies, D.E. Tabachnick, L. Bradshaw (eds.), Lanham 2017, s. 87–106.
Nwannekanma B., UK suspends Asylum policy for IPOB, MASSOB, „Guardian” 24.04.2021, https://guardian.ng/news/uk-suspends-asylum-policy-for-ipob-massob.
Opwis F., Maslaha and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century, Leiden-Boston 2010.
Popp-Madsen B.A., The Nature of the State of Nature: Hobbes, Sovereignty and Biopolitics, „Tidsskriftet Politik” 17 (2014), s. 49–56.
Ribarević L., Political Economy in Leviathan: Hobbes, Macpherson and Strpić, „Politička misao: časopis za politologiju / Croatian Political Science Review” 57 (2020), s. 127–148.
Robiadek K.M., Introduction to Research Symposium on Political Economy, „Hobbes Studies” 34 (2021), s. 3–8.
Rudolph U., Al-Maturidi and the Development of Sunni Theology in Samarqand, Leiden-Boston 2015.
Rust J., The Body in Mystery: The Political Theology of the Corpus Mysticum in the Literature of Reformation England, Evanston 2014.
Rust J., Political Theologies of the Corpus Mysticum: Schmitt, Kantorowicz, and de Lubac, [w:] Political Theology and Early Modernity, G. Hammill, J.R. Lupton (eds.), Chicago 2012, s. 102–123.
Rust J., Political Theology, Pastoral Power, and Resistance, „Political Theology” 22 (2021), s. 89–94.
Rust J., The Stripping of the Altars (Symposium on the Origins of Neoliberalism), „Syndicate Theology” 2 (2017), https://syndicate.network/symposia/theology/the-origins-of-neoliberalism.
Ryan A., Hobbes and Individualism, [w:] Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, G.A.J. Rogers, A. Ryan (eds.), Oxford 1988, s. 81–106.
Sawyer S.W., Steinmetz-Jenkins D., Introduction, [w:] Foucault, Neoliberalism, and Beyond, S. W. Sawyer, D. Steinmetz-Jenkins (eds.), London-New York 2019, s. vii xxi.
Shapiro I., The Flight From Reality in the Human Sciences, Princeton Ian 2005.
Shapiro I., Political Criticism, Oxford 1990.
Shapiro I., Realism in the Study of the History of Ideas, „History of Political Thought” 3 (1982), s. 535–578.
Shapiro I., Reflections on Skinner and Pettit, „Hobbes Studies” 22 (2009), s. 185–191.
Skinner Q., Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes, Cambridge 1996.
Skinner Q., Visions of Politics, Vol. 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge 2002.
de Sousa Santos B., Human Rights as an Emancipatory Script? Cultural and Political Conditions, [w:] Another Knowledge is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies, B. de Sousa Santos (ed.), London 2007, s. 3–40.
de Sousa Santos B., The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South, Durham-London 2018.
de Sousa Santos B., Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide, London-New York 2014.
de Sousa Santos B., Gdyby Bóg był aktywistą praw człowieka, tłum. J.P. Barszczewski, Kraków 2020.
Thomas K., The Social Origins of Hobbes’ Political Thought, [w:] Hobbes Studies, K. Brown (ed.), Cambridge 1965, s. 185–236.
Thompson M.P., Michael Oakeshott and the Cambridge School on the History of Political Thought, Abingdon 2019.
Townshend J., C. B. Macpherson and the Problem of Liberal Democracy, Edinburgh 2000.
Tuck R., Hobbes, Oxford 1989.
Tully J., The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of Politics, „British Journal of Political Science” 13 (1983), s. 489–509.
Tully J., The Possessive Individualism Thesis: A Reconsideration in the Light of Recent Scholarship, [w:] Democracy and Possesive Individualism: The Intellectual Legacy of C.B. Macpherson, J. Carens (ed.), New York 1993, s. 19–44.
Turowski M., C.B. Macpherson: „indywidualizm posiadaczy” a dylematy współczesnej ontologii politycznej, Wrocław 2014.
Turowski M., Europocentryzm — technologia i ontologia kolonizacji: kilka uwag o liberalizmie, podboju, supremacji rasowej i niewolnictwie przez pryzmat tezy o indywidualizmie posesywnym Crowforda B. Macphersona, „Nowa Krytyka” 26–27 (2011), s. 291–319.
Vatter M., The Idea of Public Reason and the Reason of State: Schmitt and Rawls on the Political, „Political Theory” 36 (2008), s. 239–271.
Vincent J., Concepts et contexts de l’histoire intellectuelle britannique: l’École de Cambridge’ à l’épreuve, „Revue dʼhistoire moderne et contemporaine” 50 (2003), s. 187–207.
Vucina N., Drejer C., Triantafillou P., Histories and freedom of the present: Foucault and Skinner, „History of the Human Sciences” 24 (2011), s. 124–141.
Ward L., Equity and Political Economy in Thomas Hobbes, „American Journal of Political Science” 64 (2020), s. 823–835.
Wells R.H., Burgess G., Wymer R., Introduction, [w:] Neo-Historicism: Studies in Renaissance Literature, History and Politics, R.H. Wells, G. Burgess, R. Wymer (eds.), Cambridge 2000, s. 1–28.
Whatmore R., The History of Political Thought: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford 2022.
Williams D.L., Hobbes on Wealth, Poverty, and Economic Inequality, „Hobbes Studies” 34 (2021), s. 9–57.
Williams M., Recasting the Hobbesian Legacy in International Political Theory, [w:] International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation, R. Prokhovnik, G. Slomp (eds.), Basingstoke 2010.
Wolfson H.A., The Philosophy of Kalam, Cambridge-London 1976.
Wood N., Reflections on Political Theory: A Voice of Reason from the Past, Basingstoke 2002.
Zagorin P., Hobbes and the Law of Nature, Princeton 2009.
Zammito J.H., Rorty, ‘Historicism’ and the Practice of History: A Polemic, „Rethinking History” 10 (2006), s. 9–47.
Zamora D., Foucault, the Excluded, and the Neoliberal Erosion of the State, [w:] Foucault and Neoliberalism, D. Zamora, M.C. Behrent (eds.), Cambridge 2016, s. 63–84.
English
Język Polski
https://doi.org/10.19195/1895-8001.19.1.8
